<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Disable Explicit Songs in Desktop (Windows)</title>
    <link>https://community.spotify.com/t5/Desktop-Windows/Disable-Explicit-Songs/m-p/1124120#M368</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Slacker Radio is really a different beast than Spotify. However, your post makes think about two different use cases and how explicit lyrics would work within them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One scenario is the radio feature, where you simply want to be able to a radio station without the explicit lyrics. I think that's the easiest one to &amp;nbsp;implement and would have two options: block all explicit songs, or substitie radio editions. Spotify could get a quick, big win if they implemented this as many of the users on this thread want explicit filtering in this context.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The other scenario is that of the user who browses and searches for music on-demand. I could see that taking a little more work as you'd have to filter out query results based on the flag in the user's configuration settings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:51:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>user-removed</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-04-29T16:51:46Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

