<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic [Android][Other] Sprint Service Must Be Tested in Android</title>
    <link>https://community.spotify.com/t5/Android/Android-Other-Sprint-Service-Must-Be-Tested/m-p/4855189#M159282</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Sprint service must be rigorously tested for ad videos and for the sake of sponsors' ROI. Is Sprint ripping off sponsors?&amp;nbsp; It surely seems that way from what I've observed. Are they cutting off ads to play for a much shorter time than normal, or sometimes not letting ads run at all?&amp;nbsp; This is what I've been experiencing, and I don't suspect that Spotify is to blame for it.&amp;nbsp; I suspect that Sprint is, and believe me, I don't like it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At home, sometimes I get two bars out of five for data coverage.&amp;nbsp; This might seem to cause problems with receiving videos, but the truth is, normally it doesn't.&amp;nbsp; I can do very well with YouTube and TubiTV, for example.&amp;nbsp; While I know not every sponsor or advertisement will be wildly popular, sponsors have still invested money in paying to support Spotify service for the rest of us, essentially.&amp;nbsp; I don't accept the idea that Sprint should be interfering with advertising, and neither should Spotify.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please test this idea thoroughly and rigorously.&amp;nbsp; Your sponsors deserve it, and if we think about it, since these sponsors are paying for our Spotify service, we deserve to have the system running properly as well.&amp;nbsp; (I'm sure that those who disagree can find a way to readjust their own volume controls.)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2019 05:48:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>franktmorgan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-11-10T05:48:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>[Android][Other] Sprint Service Must Be Tested</title>
      <link>https://community.spotify.com/t5/Android/Android-Other-Sprint-Service-Must-Be-Tested/m-p/4855189#M159282</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sprint service must be rigorously tested for ad videos and for the sake of sponsors' ROI. Is Sprint ripping off sponsors?&amp;nbsp; It surely seems that way from what I've observed. Are they cutting off ads to play for a much shorter time than normal, or sometimes not letting ads run at all?&amp;nbsp; This is what I've been experiencing, and I don't suspect that Spotify is to blame for it.&amp;nbsp; I suspect that Sprint is, and believe me, I don't like it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At home, sometimes I get two bars out of five for data coverage.&amp;nbsp; This might seem to cause problems with receiving videos, but the truth is, normally it doesn't.&amp;nbsp; I can do very well with YouTube and TubiTV, for example.&amp;nbsp; While I know not every sponsor or advertisement will be wildly popular, sponsors have still invested money in paying to support Spotify service for the rest of us, essentially.&amp;nbsp; I don't accept the idea that Sprint should be interfering with advertising, and neither should Spotify.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please test this idea thoroughly and rigorously.&amp;nbsp; Your sponsors deserve it, and if we think about it, since these sponsors are paying for our Spotify service, we deserve to have the system running properly as well.&amp;nbsp; (I'm sure that those who disagree can find a way to readjust their own volume controls.)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2019 05:48:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.spotify.com/t5/Android/Android-Other-Sprint-Service-Must-Be-Tested/m-p/4855189#M159282</guid>
      <dc:creator>franktmorgan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-10T05:48:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

