Type in your question below and we'll check to see what answers we can find...
Loading article...
Submitting...
If you couldn't find any answers in the previous step then we need to post your question in the community and wait for someone to respond. You'll be notified when that happens.
Simply add some detail to your question and refine the title if needed, choose the relevant category, then post.
Before we can post your question we need you to quickly make an account (or sign in if you already have one).
Don't worry - it's quick and painless! Just click below, and once you're logged in we'll bring you right back here and post your question. We'll remember what you've already typed in so you won't have to do it again.
Please see below the most popular frequently asked questions.
Loading article...
Loading faqs...
Please see below the current ongoing issues which are under investigation.
Loading issue...
Loading ongoing issues...
Considering the allegations made from the Finding Netherland documentary, that victims should be believed, and the actions being taken from other platforms - I feel there's a moral case for Spotify to remove Michael Jackson's portfolio of music from its platform.
Wandat46: "It's funny how people like you and these liars, whose stories have changed many times are concerned about Michael Jackson's money. Don't you realize that the first thing his fans will do is go out and buy every cd he ever made? Chaching! I know that's what I'm going to do. I've had Spotify premium for over 2 years, I will cancel my subscription and listen to his music somewhere else. Control yourself and stop worrying about what his fans want to listen to. You never have to listen to his music. You have a choice, makes it for yourself, and not me."
I totally agree. What about the documentaries Lies of Leaving Neverland, Square One: Michael Jackson, Chase the Truth and so on? Every single allegation against Jackson was fully disproven. All the info and all the receipts are here: The Michael Jackson Allegations.
I think this thread should be closed.
1. They are not victims but two serial liars both in debt who concocted allegations when both faced massive money problems. Both tried to scare the Jackson estate into a settlement in 2013 and 2014 and because the estate refused to pay them and their cases were dismissed in court they made this sick one sides deceptively edited propaganda film to ruin Jackson's legacy and his estate's business and boost their chance in court after an appeal.
2. Nobody, absolutely nobody is obliged to believe a word those proven perjurers say especially when they have been caught in countless lies and their allegations are heavily based on the pro pedophilia book Michael Jackson was my lover written by Victor Gutierrez , the NAMBLA supporter whom Jackson sued for defamation.
The allegations are ridiculous when you fact check them and use common sense. They are also not backed up by any proof and already dozens of men who knew Jackson as kids came forward to contradict the narrative. Shocking means nothing. Daniel Kapon Joe Bartucci both accused Jakcson of shocking child abuse...when in reality they never even met him. Anyone can make up shocking claims especially against a dead man. Watch Lies of Leaving Neverland and Square One on YouTube or Amazon. See the evidence of Jackson's innocence not just the BS the mass media serves you
Not it's not just the estate who openly defended him it's the very people who knew him as kids including Macaculay Culkin and Brett Barnes whom that sick film depicted as victims when in fact they are not victims at all , they have nothing but good to say about Jackson. Robson Safechuck can get away with this and many other lies because they are white men who accused Michael Jackson. If they were black women accusing the dead Bowie the media would expose them for the frauds they really are. you would want to cancel Jackson's art over the mere words of a man who claimed abuse in a building which was not even built yet? Don't you see how insane this is?
REPORT: ‘Leaving Neverland’ Discrepancy Found In Key Part Of Film Denouncing Michael Jackson
1. There is tons of smoke over the accusers, in fact there is proof they are liars and financial predators.
2. They are attacking not just MJ but living people like Jolie Levine who did not do anything against them. You don't know what these two men have been doing since 2012 to get the money they want. They are the most disgusting rape liars I have ever seen and I have seen many.
3. No those accusations were not put to him his whole life not even close. Rather over 35 years only THREE corrupt families accused him all of them going after his money. Two of those families were exposed in court as liars and third one did not even want to show up in court to be cross examined. What does that tell you? They only wanted money.
4. The evidence is overwhelming that he was innocent and false accused by greedy opportunists. Why do you think out of the dozens of families who were close to him only THOSE few accused him, always wanting more and more from him or his estate?
5. He did not ruin any child's life to the contrary he helped and saved children all his life and nobody should ignore that because that's the truth.
Hey there you, Yeah, you! 😁 Welcome - we're glad you joined the Spotify Community! While you here, let's have a fun game and get…