[All Platforms][Music] HiFi Quality - Lossless Streaming 16bit 44.1khz

[timiambeing]

I've just started a trial of Qobuz - they offer the standard 320kbps as well as lossless FLAC streaming (and high res downloads if you purchase them) the sound quality is noticeably better and on classical it's just wonderful to get all that resolution through your hi-fi or headphones! The catalogue has a way to go to get to Spotify's level, but they are getting there. The iPad app isn't' too bad (the desktop app is in need of an upgrade but I hear they are putting all their efforts into mobile apps right now).

So - lossless streaming - if Qobuz can do it then so can Spotify, they must have the same source - and obviously if you are asking £20 a month then those record labels and distributors take enough notice to make the high res tracks available for streaming. What this all means is soon, very soon, we will get lossless streaming and closely followed by high res downloads - but if Spotify aren't careful it will be Apple who get there first with an audiophile premium offering, and when they do it will be a much harder market place to make money in!

** please don't lump this suggestion with the main one on lossless downloads, that's a different idea entirely guys!

[timiambeing]

I've just started a trial of Qobuz - they offer the standard 320kbps as well as lossless FLAC streaming (and high res downloads if you purchase them) the sound quality is noticeably better and on classical it's just wonderful to get all that resolution through your hi-fi or headphones! The catalogue has a way to go to get to Spotify's level, but they are getting there. The iPad app isn't' too bad (the desktop app is in need of an upgrade but I hear they are putting all their efforts into mobile apps right now).

[timiambeing]

So - lossless streaming - if Qobuz can do it then so can Spotify, they must have the same source - and obviously if you are asking £20 a month then those record labels and distributors take enough notice to make the high res tracks available for streaming. What this all means is soon, very soon, we will get lossless streaming and closely followed by high res downloads - but if Spotify aren't careful it will be Apple who get there first with an audiophile premium offering, and when they do it will be a much harder market place to make money in!

[Sergjjii]

@superlexa, they've been leading people around for a long time, handing out some promises and then just ditching those people. That's not the behavior of a world-class company, it's the behavior of a small salesman from a small market. I'm sure most people just haven't listened to high definition music and so they're just unaware that you can have a totally different, amazing experience listening to music. Because after listening to good quality music, you're unlikely to go back to low quality music, plus spotfy's price tag is clearly overpriced. I understand if they would pay artists a decent fee, they even pay very little to artists, where all that money they collect from both artists and users goes, it's a mystery.

[Zorq]

@LawLee 

When you move up in total system resolution, the more the difference is evident. With most of my equipment the difference is not subtle at all. Space, sound stage, clarity, definition are remarkably different, that is easy to A/B for everyone. In tonality, bass is far more clear and better resolved. Timbres are more rich. Mids and highs more fluid. In comparison, Spotify 320 kbps sounds muddy and veiled in tonality, and constrained in space and time (decay).

The differences also depend on the master quality, I am not sure that the same master was used in all of my Spotify vs Qobuz vs Tidal vs Apple comparisons. All in all, I also find Qobuz being the best sounding. It's pity I don't like its interface as much. Its connect thing doesn't really work, either. Anyway, my streamers all support it, and I play it from Roon. 

[LawLee]

@Zorq I agree with you. Its been hilarious to listen to some music on Qobuz that I thought was poorly mastered. There is a marked if not breathtaking improvement in comparison to Spotify's "Very High". Rediscovery is both exhilarating and irritating. What a fool I've been! I was planning on replacing 9 speakers thinking something was wrong with my two AV systems. 

Don't know if you saw my earlier posts but I have a mini 5.1 system on my desk in my office. I listen critically for hours a day a reference levels. It been characterized flat with Room Equalizer Wizard. I'm so obsessed with maximizing my listening enjoyment that I keep a calibrated sound pressure app running to make sure I can blast without ruining my hearing. 

And yes, at every step in resolution, from Spotify's so called "Very High" to FLAC at 44.1kHz, 16bit all the way to 192kHz, 24bit, I can hear a difference. The biggest jump occurs when you jump from lossy 320kbs to CD quality. I would be content IF Spotify would deliver that Hifi CD quality they promised. 

But once you hear the difference, there's no going back. I guess it similar to what happens when you first hear a high performing, highly tuned audio system over a mediocre one. Its not possible for me to settle for Spotify anymore. 

Got a question for you. Have you done a A/B comparison of lossless FLAC ripped CD's versus lossless streams? Even when I import music on Qobuz at CD or higher, My ripped CD's sound slightly better and have improved imaging. What do you think accounts for this? What's been your experience?

[Zorq]

@LawLee

> Have you done a A/B comparison of lossless FLAC ripped CD's versus lossless streams? Even when I import music on Qobuz at CD or higher, My ripped CD's sound slightly better and have improved imaging. 

I think that comparison depends on many variables, depending how your streamer is set up (EM noise, DAC, PSU etc).

When I listen via the same streamer, there is a slight advantage for ripped WAV played from local HDD via PCIe or even via NAS (powered clean). I'd say the streamed FLAC is totally competitive with ripped FLAC in my systems, even if it marginally loses against ripped FLAC and WAV and even more to the original high end CD player/transport (that uses the same DAC) -- the biggest perceived difference being the way the bass notes are delivered (more real impact) and the dynamics of the attack & decay. Perhaps even more precise imaging. But all of this will depend on each particular playback element (streamer, CD player, etc).

I agree the biggest quality jump is from lossy 320 kbps to lossless CD quality, but every step up is still discernable, if the analog part of the system keeps up in resolution (the Wadia paradigm). For the most part I am fine with Qobuz CD res FLAC, which is what I'd expect from Spotify, too.

[peter2456]

bring on hi fi quality.whats the hold up.

[LawLee]

@superlexa

I think you're reading our replies incorrectly, or at least mine I should say. I personally am not moaning about Spotify.

Firstly, I have moved on. I put my money where my mouth is, or I guess I should say my ears are, and subscribed to Qobuz. I was able to transfer my playlists through Soundiiz. This was based on a suggestion that came through this forum. I'm not using Spotify, not even the free ad-supported version on principle. Not one ad-supported penny from me until they fix this sound quality deficiency. I'm doing this in spite of the fact that I really do like Spotify. I'm just a principled person like that.

Secondly, I do believe that Spotify is listening. I'll tell you why. A number of my posts (and those of others I've corresponded with) are only up for a couple of seconds before they're taken down by the moderators. These are generally my posts where I try to give some objective reviews of Spotify or of what I believe are the reasons or the delay. Now it seems I'm being prevented from sending private emails too.

I suspect some of these are hitting too close to home. I find it amusing. So I believe they are paying attention to what people are saying here. But this is beginning to seem like a forum that is monitored, and dare I say manipulated.

I'm not so sure that only 25,513 people voted for this. How many people on the street, in the media, or on this thread are saying lossless doesn't matter? Almost everyone here is upset about the delay and most of the people here have moved to some other service or are threatening it.

My presence on the forum is to try to get a message to Spotify in a useful, honest, and civil way.

I also appreciate the community of people that are here. For me right now this is the best part of Spotify. Hilarious.

[LawLee]

@Zorq

I actually rather like the Qobuz app for Android. The one for the PC works best. But clearly neither of these has the playlist organization features of Spotify. Clearly too Qobuz's "Album suggestions" algorithm needs some work. I wish there was some unified way to the content delivered to my receiver, much like Spotify connect but I'm not lacking. I have a plethora of options.

I made some fortunate choices. I can actually use 3 ways to get Qobuz into my Yamaha home theater receivers. These are ranked in terms of sound quality, from best to just great.

1. Using the Yamaha Musiccast app on my Android tablet I can access Qobuz and transmit directly to my receiver. Through Musiccast I can even change the Qobuz streaming rate on the fly, up to a max of 192kHz, 24bit max..
 

2. From my computer I can drive the Windows Qobuz app using WASAPI in exclusive mode from my Windows computer to my receiver via SPDIF at 192kHz, 24bit max.

3. From the Qobuz app on my Android devices using a Chromecast adapter I can stream from my Android devices at 48kHz, 24bit max.

All sound great but the nod goes to 192kHz, 24bit. Its noteworthy that Dolby Atmos is typically encoded at 48kHz, but I've heard good sounding examples at 44.1kHz, 16bit. Interestingly, if you search Spotify recently you'll find listed Dolby Atmos tracks and playlists as well.

I recently re-ripped 300 CDs to FLAC. I used "jitter corrected read" encoding with at Compression Level 0.

I serve my media files to my receivers two ways. These are again ranked in terms of sound quality

1. The cleanest and best method for playing my FLAC is accessing them through MusicCast from a USB drive plugged into my receiver. I have a tiny drive the holds 256GB. This method produces the best sound quality and the switching between songs is instantaneous.

1. I can also use MediaMonkey; a strangely named but impressive player using their DNLA\UPnP output. This works flawlessly and even displays the album art in Musiccast and the track name on my receiver's display.

2. There is also a  MediaMonkey app for android and its equally impressive. It too uses DNLA\UPnP to my reciever.

For me Spotify Connect is effectively nullified.

[Audioplayer]

@LawLee

Qobuz has just started work on it’s own connect feature so although it is coming it will take them a while before it is available to users. Hopefully it will be as good or better than Spotify’s connect. What will be available from Qobuz soon is an updated layout of artist’s pages/discographies at the very least.

[Sal1950]

Pitiful,,  just pitiful.

A full year and this is all you guys at Spotify have to say for yourself?

Account canceled and Apple now gets my monthly money.

[LawLee]

Et al,

I got a pleasant surprise this morning from Amazon. Amazon's app on Android is a dumpster fire. It is positively the worst application for landscape mode support. Try viewing "x-ray" or listening to a podcast. It flips the screen to portrait mode. It won't support split screen mode at all. They need to fix these issues. However, it does connect me directly to my receiver if its configured through the Goggle Home app. With that configuration a am able to stream over wifi at 192kHz, 24 bit, and Dolby Atmos. It also supports my Chromecast receiver up to 48kHz, 24 bit with Atmos support as well.

Amazon's Musiccast support has always been spotty [that's not a pun against Spotify by the way]. This morning though, surprise, it connected through Musiccast and allowed me to listen to music directly at 192 kHz 24 bit.

Some progress is good. So out of my good nature, I decided to turn on my Amazon unlimited subscription once more. So I'm back to paying $23 a month for Qobuz and Amazon. For now…

One thing that's nice about Amazon is their Technical Support. Back when I was first having problems with Musiccast I had a technician named Travis who called ME every week on Tuesday by appointment. For a couple of months. Pretty amazing for a company as large as Amazon to have such interest in a $7 Music subscription. Big companies can be responsive.

I've had the same great support from Qobuz When I asked questions about their service and even offered suggestions, I got honest, personal email replies from them. Pretty amazing. So I'm happy to support them as well with my dollars.

Hey Spotify!!!

I'd be happy to throw some of those dollars maybe your way, if you released CD quality lossless Hifi. It's your call…