@heartscore, yeah JayLB also mentioned about this. Basically, there's no comparing between "The Who" and "Limp Bizkit" but this song particularly I liked more, I can't say why, but just closer to my taste xD
Also, awesome rant, I don't quite like the a-a-a-y part also
MartinStoichkovRock Star 11
Help others find this answer and click "Accept as Solution".
If you appreciate my answer, maybe give me a Like.
Cher used Autotune as an artistic effect, which was fresh and groundbreaking. Unfortunately the audible autotune-effect became an annoying standard on vocals later. To be honest it's hard to believe, that somebody is not using it nowadays for inaudible corrections, because everybody uses it and the modern production-standards are calling for perfection in every detail. They correct everything, the intonation, the timing ...
BTW to hate Autotune as an audible effect is not heretic :)
Apologies if my lengthy post was confusing; I actually like Auto-Tune when used tastefully as an artistic effect for artists like Cher, Galantis, or Daft Punk. But I'm a heretic in the sense I'm still that guy in the group who corrects my friends when they talk about an amazing singer who's actually using Auto-Tune because they can't sing without it. :)
You hit the nail on the head though - the industry norm seems to call for pitch-perfect sequenced pop music because that's what people want now, which is totally fine. Everyone has a different musical preference; I guess I just miss the old days of imperfection and live improvisation without all the electronic perfection.