Announcements

Help Wizard

Step 1

NEXT STEP

QUEUE management still sucks, after how many years?

QUEUE management still sucks, after how many years?

I want to echo the original post: "make it work like Rdio’s did"

 

What, we're five years in and no improvements in queue management?

 

I'll go years back and reiterate that:

1) there should be a way to "play next"

2) an "album," a "playlist" and a "song" should all be treated equally (e.g. if I have a queue already built, when I hit "play" on a playlist, that WHOLE playlist should play before the rest of the queue resumes, ditto an album, (it does this for a song).  Five freakin' years without decent queue management.  Shameful.

Reply
3 Replies

Just to refresh this topic. Every other music organization system (iTunes, Winamp, Google Music, Deezer, Groove Radio, etc.) ALL function in the way below. Only Spotify chooses this inane queue setup.

 

Copy and paste to reiterate that:

1) there should be a way to "play next"

2) an "album," a "playlist" and a "song" should all be treated equally (e.g. if I have a queue already built, when I hit "play" on a playlist, that WHOLE playlist should play before the rest of the queue resumes, ditto an album, (it does this for a song).  

 

Five years without decent queue management.  

Yeah I was forced to Spotify from Groove and can't for the life of me believe how backwards the queue system is. It doesn't work like any I've used before. 

No clear queue?

Can't shuffle queue?

I'm baffled.

And the web player has no queue??!! Seriously WTH!?

Suggested posts