Mark / Disable AI Generated Songs

[DerKEKl]

The platform is increasingly flooded with AI-generated songs (especially the Release Radar), making it harder for users to discover authentic, human-created music. To improve the listening experience, Spotify should introduce a clear label for AI-generated songs and provide an option to filter them out entirely.

[Stoned78]

How many votes and comments before Spotify usually react? 

I have been very aware when listening to music in here. I do not enjoy using spotify playlists not made by myself which is a bummer. 

Considering just going back to torrents and cancel my Spotify if this continues.

Anyone that pay for youtube premium i assume also include the youtube music. So in reality all those with youtube premium could just cancel Spotify if they do not comply 

[AxMn]

Eye matey, seemed like better sailing back in the ol' eye-patch days.

Sadly Youtube's even worse, just think about all that AI slop voiceover and random background video **bleep** they keep shoving in our eye sockets ever day. I mean Google's been front-lining the whole AI movement for the last decade and a half, started with AI search results replacing the old PageRank system with useless mashups, now it's replacing entire youtube channels complete with fully AI generated fake news too, with fake misleading headlines morphing and changing every couple of hours hoping to trick you into clicking on it, feeding the machine, which then spews more of that garbage thinking because you clicked on one, you must want more no matter how many times you downvote it.

Come to think of it... why doesn't youtube show downvote counts the same as upvotes...bet those numbers would be very enlightening.

[Juggen]

If this doesn't get implemented soon I'm leaving this platform. Been using it (Premium) for over 15 years and never thought about switching before.

[Drumsticky]

I love music. It has been the most special and influential aspect of my life since I was was a child moving my feet in rhythm to VU meters of a 4- track player (yes, in the days before cassette tapes). I go to live shows all the time. Now my question is... I play drums and write lyrics. I don't have a band but want to share my music. If I create a rhythm and lyrics, then use AI to create the rest of the instruments and vocals does it count as "real music". Using AI and a DAW will be very time consuming for me (like collaboration with other musicians) in order to get the perfect sound I want. I think that by using computers this way is playing technology as an instrument and I am the conductor. I believe that if it can't be performed live it isn't "real music". In this instance session musicians would be required to fill the other instruments and essentially the live version would be different in many ways to the recorded version. I love the live shows because they are always unique, this would be too. So. Am I making music or deceiving my audience?

[AxMn]

AI's weren't taught scales, didn't practice twinkle twinkle little star until it's fingers bled, didn't discover Grunge in their teen's, form a band with their mates, struggle to pay rent while playing dive bars for drinks, only to be discovered, go on tour and become a superstar. No, AI was force fed millions of tracks of real music, it had no appreciation for it, it just dissected those works of art and distilled it down into a bunch of ones and zeros, then following your prompts it reassembles those component parts back into something resembling a song. It has no soul, it has no heart, it's just a machine.

Those AI's you'd be using were trained on the creations of REAL musicians, without their consent, and more often than not, against their consent when they were asked and refused to sell the rights to their music. No matter how you slice it, the AI corporation stole from them, and you'd be stealing from them too. Are you comfortable with stealing from other artists? Would you be comfortable with others stealing from you?