We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.
turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Closed Ideas
POST AN IDEA
Options
- Collapse View
- Expand View
- Mark all as New
- Mark all as Read
- Float this item to the top
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Invite a Friend
Status:
Case Closed
Submitted on
2018-04-24
05:26 AM
Submitted by
wit_sec_birb
on
2018-04-24
05:26 AM
Hello all, My name is Dan and I am a volunteer for Verge Currency. I am reaching out to you today to suggest about and request a formal evaluation of our currency in hopes that you find it a suitable fit to your platform. We are extremely excited to announce that we have recently partnered with Mindgeek, a privately held company that owns and operates over 85% of all the adult entertainment industries websites and applications. As we have seen with past events in history, what the adult entertainment industry adopts – The world adopts. The adult entertainment industry has paved the way for many huge innovations such as the popularizing of VHS tapes, the internet as we know it today, Virtual reality and now cryptocurrency. Some quick facts on how this partnership is going to affect Verge Currency’s market exposure: Mindgeek has 115,000,000+ Daily visitors spread throughout their network of web properties and an average of 3,000,000,000 ad impressions served to dozens of millions of daily visitors. With all that being said – Establishing this partnership will inevitably ensure a massive increase in demand for a direct way for consumers to be able to purchase VERGE/XVG direct with their Credit, Debit and Bank accounts. Below you will find a list of helpful resources to aid in your determination of our currency: https://vergecurrency.com https://github.com/vergecurrency https://vergecurrency.com/static/blackpaper/Verge-Anonymity-Centric-CryptoCurrency.pdf I do hope you find this suggestion to be important and note that we are scouring the internet to find any and all available resources at our disposal to ensure that consumers will be able to take advantage of our new found partnership and the benefits it entails. This is a monumental accomplishment for cryptocurrency in general and chance to expose hundreds of millions of new users to cryptocurrency. There is no time like the present to jump on this huge business opportunity. Thank you for your time and consideration.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Status:
Case Closed
Submitted on
2018-07-05
02:50 AM
Submitted by
Goldenfurpro
on
2018-07-05
02:50 AM
The new change from the "Songs" playlist to "Favorite Songs" is not only pointless but really confuses the original purpose of the "Songs" library. Many users used the "+" icon to save songs they were interested in, but not all of the songs users saved were "Favorite Songs". My system, for one, was to save songs I kind of liked, then go through them later. The songs I thought were the best, I removed the "+" and put those songs into another playlist entirely. So, none of the songs on that playlist are actually my favorite song and now I'm going to have difficulty returning to this system when all of these songs have hearts on them and are labeled "Favorite Songs". Just go back to the way it was. Honestly Spotify, there are so many more important changes to implement and you do this?
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
I have made a playlist, put a lot of great song in it, my friends followed, everyone loves it. But recently I noticed if I change the arrangements of the songs, my followers can't see it. They can listen by artists, recently added, or by name etc., but they can't listen it as I have arranged. In Spotify lot of playlist have a good flow to listen, and I think that would be a cool new feature to mix, and arrange your playlist as you want, and it can be seen by your followers also. It could help to feel the flow and the mood of the music. Cheers, Daniel
... View more
So I have been looking through some of the playlists on Spotify for the past couple months and I noticed one thing that has been a huge problem. Some playlists are not adding or switching to new songs on those playlists. Here’s this playlist for example https://open.spotify.com/user/spotify/playlist/37i9dQZF1DX186v583rmzp?si=c2wcz7PZRt-Ny2xPw2-OYw . This playlist has over 2 million followers which means so many people care about this playlist and it’s been having the same songs for a very long time. Even though they update this playlist, they keep adding the same freaking songs it’s been having for the past couple months. Like I think it’s a about time that a playlist like this should have their songs changed. Like change the songs on your playlists for once and not keep adding the same songs as it did last time!
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
There should be an Equalizer for the Desktop version of Spotify. Since Spotify's mobile apps now have an EQ setting, this should be implemented on the desktop version, too! The EQ should come with various presets but also the ability to save your own custom settings.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
In the iOS app (not sure about Android) Spotify is only supporting a limited number of devices at the same time (which includes groups). This is a huge limitation thinking of Chromecast as a multi-room audio system. The idea/request is to implement support for more simultaneous devices as you would expect it to be (as all other apps supporting Chromecast are already doing this). Here an example of the issue comparing different apps supporting Chromecast Audio: Google Home (3 devices and 2 groups) TuneIn and Google Music (3 devices and 2 groups) Spotify (only 2 devices and 2 groups) As you can see, Spotify is only displaying 4 devices in the list even though there are more available. This has also been brought up in the community several times (unfortunately I can not add any links here but just search for " [Chromecast] Not all devices listed in device list" in the community ). Thank you!
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Status:
Case Closed
Submitted on
2017-02-24
08:49 PM
Submitted by
tesshenkel
on
2017-02-24
08:49 PM
The Inbox/Messaging feature did not get a real shot at even being a feature because Spotify took away notifications for new messages. Give Inbox/Messaging some development so users can continue to privately share songs.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Hello Spotify! I decided recently that I would finally upgrade to Spotify premium, HOWEVER , now I am thinking of changing my mind because you cannot add full albums to playlists. I love Taylor Swift and wanted to make my own playlist with some of her albums on it, but after realizing I would have to go into the albums I wanted and individually add each song, I changed my mind as that would take forever. PLEASE consider changing this option, and making it possible to add full albums to playlists , it would be much more convenient. I love Spotify but this might be a dealbreaker for me.
... View more
Over the last few weeks more and more users are getting a random string of characters as usernames, even if they specified a normal one during sign up. No one on the community website is getting any info from Spotify as to what is going on. During a chat with support I was told: "As part of the long-term plans to remove the username from the sign-up flow, we started rolling out the new sign-up option, with display name instead of a username on the Web page." This does not really answer why we are expected to give people gibberish if we want to connect to our friends, nor why this major change has been implemented without any information going to the public. So my idea is: Don't Do That. Don't make us use gibberish to connect to people, don't make us use gibberish to sign in, don't ask us to choose a username then ignore our requests and replace them with gibberish, and don't make these kinds of changes without informing us as to what you are doing, why you are doing it, and what benifit it may have for us.
... View more
Dear Spotify, You have a locked thread from 2017 on a related idea where the answer was "no" but I think it needs to be reconsidered in 2018 in the aftermath of your "hate conduct" policy attempt and backpedal. As you said in the reversal "we believe our intentions were good, the language was too vague, we created confusion and concern". Here is a way you can let your users speak out where you have had trouble. Implement a "mute artist" feature to let your users decide which artists they don't want to see within Spotify. These conversations always get two user motivations mixed together: 1. Desire to boycott artist on ethical grounds 2. Desire to avoid and artist/song on aesthetic grounds A "mute artist" feature like this wouldn't be able to distinguish between these two motivations. I'm primarily concerned about (1) but I don't think it hurts to give users control over (2) in trying to solve this problem. I know that letting users opt-out of any content is probably tricky to negotiate with your business partners. I'm sure you get lots of money from music promotion corporations for prominent placement on Spotify. But here is a way that you can take a stand similar to the one you attempted against "hateful conduct" but instead let your users lead the way. So, please: add a "mute artist" button and let's see what happens to the mute statistics of artists like R Kelly and Chris Brown. Perhaps that data from your users will embolden you to take further and more prominent ethical stands in the industry, with your users behind you. Yes, users will also mute Nickleback, Taylor Swift, Coldplay, etc. etc. - basically any artist under the sun is loathed by someone. Yes, you'll probably lose revenue by having to factor out muted users from artist placement deals. But you'll have given your users a tool to make a dent in "hateful conduct" where your attempts have fallen flat.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
I've been using Spotify for almost 3 years now, and I've always been extremely happy with how it's performed. However, only a few of the "improvements" made to Spotify have been truly beneficial to users. It's very apparent that the community is upset about a few of the changes made in the past, such as the removal of lyrics on the desktop, and the elimination of some of the social aspects Spotify was founded on. I suggest, in order to give the users more say, that if a Spotify Community post gets to 10,000 votes (number can change), the change suggested in that vote should be implemented immediately. It seems that Spotify is being a bit unfair in which issues they pay attention to. A vote to bring back being able to see playlist followers got almost 13000 votes and has been pushed aside for years. That feature is ridiculously important, and is part of the social experience Spotify is supposed to provide. However, an anti-Alex Jones vote with around 2000 votes was given a prompt response. My point is, it is much harder to do something that political because of the risk of provoking listeners of that podcast. A lot of people disagree with it, almost 2 million listeners at one point (I am NOT defending Alex Jones). However, making it possible to see playlist followers is beneficial to everybody and by no means controversial. It is an easier fix, and would make a lot of people happy. The point of this community is to provide the users with a voice, but it just seems that it doesn't do its job as it should. Even when 13000 people come together to ask for a small change, they get ignored. There should be a vote checkpoint that when surpassed gets the change made. If the change faces opposition, then another vote can be made and pass the same benchmark to get it reverted.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
How about ordering playlists alphabetically? I'm paying for this service and this feature is the most common and easiest one even for a free music player...
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
In Israel, the week starts on Sunday, so it misses the point of waiting to the beginning of the week for the Discover Weekly to be updated, like the rest of the countries in which the week start at Mondays.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Hi, i didnt find a similar idea. It would be great when the user clicks the Albums section to visualize a list with their respective titles without seeing the songlist, it happens to be tedious when the Artist has a long number of Albums including Remastered and Live albums and the user has to scroll down or up. My suggestion is to hide the song list by defult in the Albums section, and add a filter button next to the Album title that enables the visualization of the list. The user can also acces to the songlist by clicking the Album title. Im attaching a posible interface solution. Thanks.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Is censorship of Alex Jones a hypocritical posture since there is tons of music here that is offensive to many? Suggest music that is offensive and have it removed also. Have Spotify cling to its own ideals.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
A feature like this would be really useful when you're at a party. Imagine you created a 90's, a 00's, a HipHop and a basic Party Playlists (with mainstream pop). Then you start playing the basic playlist as usual and depending on your party guests you add e.g the 90's Playlist so spotify shuffles both playlists as if it were a single one. This makes it easy to give your party music a topic while still being suitable for the one's who are more into mainstream pop. Of course there are multiple situations you could need this, like if you're going jogging and be like: "I really want to hear my motivation music but with a little more rock", so again you start your motivation playlists and easily add a rock playlist. In the end you don't need that much playlists anymore, you just need a few with clear focus point's and you easily combine them related to what you want to hear.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
This really shouldn't be a limit! Previous Idea from 2012 was closed ...
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Your listening to a podcast on Spotify, your 34 minutes and 19 seconds in. Your on a long drive and listening to something very interesting. Something so interesting you've forgotten how hungry you are. You pull off to grab a bite to eat and pause your podcast. 10 minutes later your back in the car eager to continue the story, and Spotify begins the podcast back at the start. Now your sifting throug the small timeline with your thumb, tediously trying to hone in on 34 minutes and 19 seconds of a long track on a tiny screen. If there was a bookmark function or a feature that played where you left off, it would be extremely helpful.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Nearly all the other platforms ,wheter it's a music streaming or a social media platform, let us change our username. I couldn't see whats the issue with it that such a big platform like spotify doesn't allow us to do it back then ,i can't see it now. It's such a simple thing that will make a lot of your customers very happy. We have waited more than enough for a simple thing like changing your username to be added. Please try to make some changes instead of sending some bots saying oh see with this solution you can easily solve this with this 500 step solution. Please consider.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
