Announcements

Help Wizard

Step 1

NEXT STEP

FAQs

Please see below the most popular frequently asked questions.

Loading article...

Loading faqs...

VIEW ALL

Ongoing Issues

Please see below the current ongoing issues which are under investigation.

Loading issue...

Loading ongoing issues...

VIEW ALL

Roll Back Facial ID and ID Verification Requirements to Safeguard Privacy and Internet Freedoms

Status: Live Idea
0 Likes

I recently canceled my Spotify Premium subscription due to serious privacy concerns and my strong principled opposition to the implementation of facial ID and passport/ID verification requirements, even if currently limited to certain regions. While I understand that these steps have been brought in with the excuse to meet regulatory demands from certain governments like the UK's and to promote safety, lets not kid ourselves. They represent a troubling advancement in requiring biometric data and government-issued IDs for basic entertainment access, which risks normalizing invasive surveillance and undermining personal anonymity and online autonomy.

 

My position is grounded in a firm dedication to a free society where individuals can access, share, and distribute information without excessive restrictions or fear of repercussions. Through these verification measures—such as those prompted by the UK's Online Safety Act—Spotify is contributing to a global push toward mandatory "internet IDs" for everyday online use, setting a dangerous precedent that could lead to broader controls stifling dissent, censoring content, and facilitating authoritarian oversight and control, akin to the dystopian surveillance outlined in George Orwell's 1984.

 

I am particularly worried about how these practices feed into an emerging technocratic tyranny, where corporate-government partnerships track, profile, and influence users under the pretext of protection. Parallels to systems like China's social credit model and proposed age-verification laws in the EU, US, and Australia highlight how such incremental changes will erode internet freedoms, gating access to knowledge and expression behind identity barriers, algorithmic biases, and data risks. Potential issues like data breaches, misuse by third parties such as Yoti, or data repurposing could expose users to harassment, prosecution, or harm, especially in oppressive environments.

 

Idea/Suggestion: I strongly urge Spotify to roll back these verification requirements or make them optional, to explore privacy-focused alternatives (e.g., self-declaration with warnings or enhanced parental controls without biometrics) that better balance safety with user liberty. This would help retain subscribers who value freedom alongside quality service and align Spotify with principles of an open internet.

 

While companies like Spotify may point the blame at governments like the UK's, Canada's, Australia's and other European countries, as well as certain elements within in the USA, unelected global NGOs or other entities which are clearly attempting to enforce such visions for the future, both openly and from the shadows , and Spotify is only cooperating, such excuses are what the enablers of any tyrannical regime in history have later made.

 

One could just as much also blame much too many people from the general public and companies like Spotify for going along with every next step on the tyrannical ladder.  

 

I would therefore encourage all Premium subscribers to follow me in cancelling their  subscribtions, as well as cancelling their subscriptions for any other online services that may be following suit.


I value Spotify's innovations and hope this feedback contributes to a more user and freedom-aligned future. What do others think— have you encountered these verifications, and do they concern you? Let's discuss and upvote if you agree!