Type in your question below and we'll check to see what answers we can find...
Loading article...
Submitting...
If you couldn't find any answers in the previous step then we need to post your question in the community and wait for someone to respond. You'll be notified when that happens.
Simply add some detail to your question and refine the title if needed, choose the relevant category, then post.
Before we can post your question we need you to quickly make an account (or sign in if you already have one).
Don't worry - it's quick and painless! Just click below, and once you're logged in we'll bring you right back here and post your question. We'll remember what you've already typed in so you won't have to do it again.
Please see below the most popular frequently asked questions.
Loading article...
Loading faqs...
Please see below the current ongoing issues which are under investigation.
Loading issue...
Loading ongoing issues...
Solved! Go to Solution.
Welcome to the Spotify Community, it's great to have you here! 👋
Thanks for sharing your question in such detail — it's great to see such a well-structured use of the Web API, especially in a project focused on audiobooks!
Regarding your report, I took a look at the Spotify Web API documentation again to suggest some ideas:
1. Rate Limit Quotas — audiobooks endpoints
Spotify does not currently publish specific quotas per endpoint in the public documentation. However, based on community experience, endpoints related to the user's library (/me/*) and those involving protected media, such as audiobooks, tend to be more sensitive and respond with 429 Too Many Requests at relatively low rates (even 5-10 calls can be enough in short intervals).
2. Sensitive patterns or observed behaviors
Endpoints such as /me/audiobooks and /audiobooks/{id} seem to use combined limits per user/token and IP.
Even spaced calls can generate 429s if the API identifies “pattern scraping” or “excessive hydration” behavior.
After a 429, it is highly recommended to respect the Retry-After header and wait before trying again.
3. Recommended strategies
Here are some suggestions to minimize the risk of hitting rate limits:
Implement debounce + priority by actual need: only hydrate audiobooks that are visible to the user or whose metadata is incomplete in the cache.
Store last query timestamps by ID — and avoid requerying before a minimum time (e.g. 1h).
Progressive batching: instead of fetching all the user’s books at once, preload them partially and defer the rest until active interaction.
Fallback with optimistic caching: if the data is not available at the moment, render a “placeholder” version with minimal information until the call is possible again.
Extra tip
You can monitor and log the X-RateLimit-* headers (if they are present in the HTTP response), although not all endpoints provide them.
If you want, I can help you review your hydration manager logic or build an adaptive backoff scheme with examples in Swift/Objective-C (I don't know which one you are using haha).
Keep me updated,
Cheers,
ribezaz 💚
Welcome to the Spotify Community, it's great to have you here! 👋
Thanks for sharing your question in such detail — it's great to see such a well-structured use of the Web API, especially in a project focused on audiobooks!
Regarding your report, I took a look at the Spotify Web API documentation again to suggest some ideas:
1. Rate Limit Quotas — audiobooks endpoints
Spotify does not currently publish specific quotas per endpoint in the public documentation. However, based on community experience, endpoints related to the user's library (/me/*) and those involving protected media, such as audiobooks, tend to be more sensitive and respond with 429 Too Many Requests at relatively low rates (even 5-10 calls can be enough in short intervals).
2. Sensitive patterns or observed behaviors
Endpoints such as /me/audiobooks and /audiobooks/{id} seem to use combined limits per user/token and IP.
Even spaced calls can generate 429s if the API identifies “pattern scraping” or “excessive hydration” behavior.
After a 429, it is highly recommended to respect the Retry-After header and wait before trying again.
3. Recommended strategies
Here are some suggestions to minimize the risk of hitting rate limits:
Implement debounce + priority by actual need: only hydrate audiobooks that are visible to the user or whose metadata is incomplete in the cache.
Store last query timestamps by ID — and avoid requerying before a minimum time (e.g. 1h).
Progressive batching: instead of fetching all the user’s books at once, preload them partially and defer the rest until active interaction.
Fallback with optimistic caching: if the data is not available at the moment, render a “placeholder” version with minimal information until the call is possible again.
Extra tip
You can monitor and log the X-RateLimit-* headers (if they are present in the HTTP response), although not all endpoints provide them.
If you want, I can help you review your hydration manager logic or build an adaptive backoff scheme with examples in Swift/Objective-C (I don't know which one you are using haha).
Keep me updated,
Cheers,
ribezaz 💚
Thanks so much for all of this info. I'll begin implementing these suggestions and will follow up if we're still running into issues.
—Jeffrey
You're welcome! I'm here to help if you need anything 🙂
Hey there you, Yeah, you! 😁 Welcome - we're glad you joined the Spotify Community! While you here, let's have a fun game and get…