Type in your question below and we'll check to see what answers we can find...
Loading article...
Submitting...
If you couldn't find any answers in the previous step then we need to post your question in the community and wait for someone to respond. You'll be notified when that happens.
Simply add some detail to your question and refine the title if needed, choose the relevant category, then post.
Before we can post your question we need you to quickly make an account (or sign in if you already have one).
Don't worry - it's quick and painless! Just click below, and once you're logged in we'll bring you right back here and post your question. We'll remember what you've already typed in so you won't have to do it again.
Please see below the most popular frequently asked questions.
Loading article...
Loading faqs...
Please see below the current ongoing issues which are under investigation.
Loading issue...
Loading ongoing issues...
I've no plans to move to apple because you can't use it with Sonos. However, I'm considering movung to Google because the integration between Spotify and Sonos is dreadful.
I surely wont switch. Why even should I? You have Spotify on every OS, doesnt matter how small it is. Apple music only works on a few platforms.
Yeah OFC Ill give it a go, who wouldnt? Cant go through life not trying out new things. OMG we'd all still be using horse and cart if no one tried planes, trains and automobiles. Some folk are so dedicated to a cause its truly frightening .
Looks like Taylor Swift will not be available for streaming in Apple Music, at least not her 1989 album:
Probably Apple does not pay enough, as no artist will get anything from the first 3 months free trial.
Meanwhile Björk released her latest album on Spotify:
I won't switch, I'll check it out as I have an Apple ID from my digital buying days. Apple music is going to do what Google music does. Separate streaming from available down loadable digital content. So basically you will pay 10 bucks a month to stream and to find out what is and is not available. And then the second hook is that Apple will feed you music that is sold seperate from the streaming service through iTunes, why pay twice? Might as well use ad supported services like Spotify, Rdio, and Youtube to check stuff out and then spend your 10 bucks a month for new stuff that suits the listener. Some of the newer releases can be bought in digital download copies as well as get a CD copy for the same price as what Apple is attempting to do.
Now if they were really really smart and Google music also, they would find a way to open up their vast digital catalogue all of it for monthly fee streaming and then music listeners would be getting somewhere, otherwise it is just the same old song and dance for die hard Apple device users to have their own streaming club, just like it is with hardcore Google and Android users. After all the issues with Spotify and I have only had a few issues, Spotify is still a great service, even the free ad supported service, I have noticed during the weekends the ads scale down somewhat Now if Apple was smart, really smart they would do an ad supported version for users for the first six months so people could check it out without being hooked into another smarmy business model. People forget all large businesses have think tanks and you know an ad based supscription service version was tossed around and probable a few people even had heated arguments over it in those think tank room discussions. Apple's bean counters realized they could get Apple users to pay twice for the same access to music. First with the lure that maybe, just maybe allot of iTunes catalogue stuff will be available, a vain hope for sure but allot of Apple users are just hoping this might happen, but it won't Apple could not get the holders of the Beatles content on board for streaming their content, and that could have been a big big deal for Apple if that happened, anything concerning the Beatles makes waves in the music world even today. Then another hook for when the full iTunes digital catalogue does not become available, Apple Music will feed to monthly fee streaming subscribers to try and get another $5.99 a month for specially priced offers for complete digital release downloads. I am still somewhat miffed at Apple in how they handle the iTunes switch over to more web content elements and forced allot of users to down grade back to previous version of iTunes until a good chunck of the issues were fixed.
Save you bucks I say, check stuff out on the ad supported free services, take that 15 bucks a month to amazon and get digital mp3 downloads of release content and also a CD copy shipped to you as a back up for the same price. If you have an Apple ID already you can check out the free radio from the service and see how everything gets developed before taking a plunge into it.
Definitely going to check it out at least, then see how it will go on.
Spotify used to the best the best legal streaming-service as it was the first I ever started to use many years ago (november 2009) but now some of the competitors have really made it tough challenge.
Lets see how this one goes down the line...
Talking about Google Play Music, they offer a free ad-supported tier in the U.S. since yesterday with human-curated playlists / radios based on Songza:
http://www.theverge.com/2015/6/23/8830629/google-play-music-free-streaming-now-available
Google play is getting there, they should have really thrown a monkey wrench into Apply Music after their stunt with licensing rights for music on Youtube, google play should be offering a full ad supported music streaming, rather than just a Pandora radio knock off Internet radio service. Ohh well, one day they will all get there.
As far as I know, Apple Music doesn't even offer a free version. Also, the claim is that Apple Music will have way more music, however, this takes into account that you have access to Apple Music in all countries, not just Apple Muisc in the country you're in. Personally, I can find far more on Spotify than I can on US iTunes, and I'm assuming that your subscription to Apple Music would draw from the music available in your country. As a fan of a lot of foreign music, I've pretty much ditched even looking at iTunes. Obviously, Apple will draw in artists, but I can't imagine it's music library being THAT much bigger than Spotify, and having playlists set up and what not, I don't plan on switching to something that may only be marginally better at best.
What is the rate of available music on Apple from category independent hands up, jumpstyle, dancecore and hardstyle? I tried Google Play Music pass for free and content was so boring. A lot of faves missing, I can find them on Spotify.
I pay happy 9.99 € for Spotify to get my music from one place.
Apple Music for Free. Unlimited tunes.
Check this out!
Still doubting (I've always been an satisfied Spotify user) but during the fact that all my devices are from Apple the sync in between would be a good solution (as Spotify is not the best on my Mac) to go over to Apple Music. But, the downthing I already encountered at first is that I don't (and won't) connect my creditcard to my Apple ID, which makes it for me only possible to buy each month Apple cards to extend my Apple money on my account. While spotify has PayPal, iDeal, etc etc. Perfect
Also wondering if Apple Music has such community playlists (which I like as they got updated quiet often) so I got less maintance to do :3
Hey there you, Yeah, you! 😁 Welcome - we're glad you joined the Spotify Community! While you here, let's have a fun game and get…