I won't switch, I'll check it out as I have an Apple ID from my digital buying days. Apple music is going to do what Google music does. Separate streaming from available down loadable digital content. So basically you will pay 10 bucks a month to stream and to find out what is and is not available. And then the second hook is that Apple will feed you music that is sold seperate from the streaming service through iTunes, why pay twice? Might as well use ad supported services like Spotify, Rdio, and Youtube to check stuff out and then spend your 10 bucks a month for new stuff that suits the listener. Some of the newer releases can be bought in digital download copies as well as get a CD copy for the same price as what Apple is attempting to do.
Now if they were really really smart and Google music also, they would find a way to open up their vast digital catalogue all of it for monthly fee streaming and then music listeners would be getting somewhere, otherwise it is just the same old song and dance for die hard Apple device users to have their own streaming club, just like it is with hardcore Google and Android users. After all the issues with Spotify and I have only had a few issues, Spotify is still a great service, even the free ad supported service, I have noticed during the weekends the ads scale down somewhat Now if Apple was smart, really smart they would do an ad supported version for users for the first six months so people could check it out without being hooked into another smarmy business model. People forget all large businesses have think tanks and you know an ad based supscription service version was tossed around and probable a few people even had heated arguments over it in those think tank room discussions. Apple's bean counters realized they could get Apple users to pay twice for the same access to music. First with the lure that maybe, just maybe allot of iTunes catalogue stuff will be available, a vain hope for sure but allot of Apple users are just hoping this might happen, but it won't Apple could not get the holders of the Beatles content on board for streaming their content, and that could have been a big big deal for Apple if that happened, anything concerning the Beatles makes waves in the music world even today. Then another hook for when the full iTunes digital catalogue does not become available, Apple Music will feed to monthly fee streaming subscribers to try and get another $5.99 a month for specially priced offers for complete digital release downloads. I am still somewhat miffed at Apple in how they handle the iTunes switch over to more web content elements and forced allot of users to down grade back to previous version of iTunes until a good chunck of the issues were fixed.
Save you bucks I say, check stuff out on the ad supported free services, take that 15 bucks a month to amazon and get digital mp3 downloads of release content and also a CD copy shipped to you as a back up for the same price. If you have an Apple ID already you can check out the free radio from the service and see how everything gets developed before taking a plunge into it.